Really? come on, really? so no body ever notices this

http://www.allfaith.com/Religions/Noahide/sheep.html

image below from interesting blog

how can Novus ordo be so blatant?

http://4thepriests.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/40th-birthday-of-novus-ordo-mass-ignites-reactions-not-candles-for-the-cake/

I mean really  http://www.novusordowatch.org/mass.htm

Invalidity of the Novus Ordo Missae

truly wack youtube videos of novus ordo all over the place

novus clown ordo

The prayers in the Tridentine Mass are pregnant with Catholic theology and spirituality. The Judica me, prayers to the Trinity, prays for the dead, the unabashed reference to saints and angels, the Confiteor, and even the Last Gospel has been removed. These all have great meaning and significance. Mass was, and is to the Traditionalist Catholic, a sort of mini-catechism. The Tradition of the Church is declared, and the Faith of the Church is prayed. Even “small” matters such as genuflecting when referencing the incarnation have been tossed to the wind. well said on the post Rejecting the Novus Ordo Missae

I don’t know you can’t tell me all this is coincidence

when how why did this happen? what’s the point?

Was October 22, 1967 the most ominous and frightening day in the two-thousand-year history of the Catholic Church, and certainly in the history of the Church in the United States of America?  Did that day see a legalized contradiction of hitherto inviolate decrees and norms guarding the Canon of the Mass?  Did it possibly even bring a new era of darkness into the world, the extinguishing of the true sacrificial and sacramental Eucharistic Christ from the majority of our churches? Rev. Lawrence S. Brey

HOW DOES CHANGING THE FORM INVALIDATE A SACRAMENT?
Changes Caused by Omission of Words . . . Changes Caused by Additions of Words . . . Changes Caused by Substitution of Words . . . The Criterion We Must Use.
6  NECESSITY OF USING OUR LORD’S WORDS FOR THE EUCHARIST
The Source of Power in These Words . . . Our Lord’s Words in the Ancient Form . . . Putting Words into Our Lord’s Mouth.
7  THE NEW “FORM” DESTROYS THE SENSE OF THE PROPER FORM
Two Distinct Aspects of Christ’s Death . . . The Aspect of Sufficiency . . . The Aspect of Efficacy . . . The Ancient, Established Form Conveys the Sense of Efficacy . . . The New “Form” Conveys the Sense of Sufficiency . . . Summary and Conclusion.
8  WHAT IS MEANT BY “THE REALITY” OF A SACRAMENT?
Three Distinct Elements in a Sacrament . . . Baptism As An Example.
9  WHAT IS “THE REALITY” OF THE SACRAMENT OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST?
The Three Elements . . . Examples To Illustrate “The Reality” of The Eucharist.
10  THE UNIQUE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EUCHARIST AND THE MYSTICAL BODY
All Sacraments Related to The Mystical Body . . . Unique Relationship of The Most Blessed Sacrament . . . The Words of Pope Pius XII . . . Summary and Preview.
11  WHO BELONGS TO THE MYSTICAL BODY?
The One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic, Roman Church . . . The Visible Church Is Necessary . . . Unbelievers and Unbaptized Persons Are Not Members . . . Heretics, Schismatics, Apostates Automatically Excluded . . . Loyalty and Adherence to the Pope Required . . . Conclusion.
12  THE NEW “FORM” SUPPRESSES WHAT IS ESSENTIAL, AND SIGNIFIES FALSELY
Christ Could Not Have Said.- “for All Men” . . . Sacraments Must Contain What They Signify and Signify What They Contain . . . External Rite of The Eucharist Must Signify The Mystical Body . . . An Opinion . . . The New “Form” Signifies Falsely . . . Identical Wording Not Required . . . The Doctrine of the Apostles . . . The Alexandrine Liturgy . . . The Canons of Hippolytus . . . “De Sacramentis” of the Pseudo-Ambrose . . . Eastern Liturgies in General . . . Gallican and Mozarabic Rites . . . Summary . . . Conclusion.

More here

Advertisements